MARC 닫기
00698nam ac200217 k 4500
000003852399
20220101120000
ta
040723s2002 uk 000 eng
▼a 0521002079
▼a 123456
▼c 123456
▼d 211070
▼l WM4951
▼a KZ6376
▼a KZ6376
▼b D46
▼a Ku,Charlotte
▼a Democratic Accountability and the Use of Force in International Law/
▼d Ku,Charlotte;
▼e Jacobson,Harold K
▼a Cambridge:
▼b Cambridge Univ.,
▼c 2002.
▼a 440p.;
▼c 23cm.
▼a United Nations
▼a Armed Forces
▼a Intervention (International law)
▼a Government liability (International law)
▼a Harold K ,Jacobson
▼b US$168
▼a 단행본
| 자료유형 : | 단행본 |
|---|---|
| ISBN : | 0521002079 |
| 분류기호 : | KZ6376 |
| 개인저자 : | Ku,Charlotte |
| 서명/저자사항 : | Democratic Accountability and the Use of Force in International Law/ Ku,Charlotte; Jacobson,Harold K |
| 발행사항 : | Cambridge: Cambridge Univ., 2002. |
| 형태사항 : | 440p.; 23cm. |
| 개인저자 : | Harold K ,Jacobson |
| 언어 | 영어 |
WMO200400876
권 호 : 440p.
발행년 : 2002
발행처 : Cambridge Univ.
서 명 : Democratic Accountability and the Use of Force in International Law
목차
I. Introduction
1. Broaching the issues
II. The domestic and international context
2. The interface of national constitutional systems with intenational law and institutions on using military forces : changing trends in executive powers
3. Domestic political factors and decisions to use military forces
4. Collective security, peacekeeping, and ad hoc multilateralism
5. The legal responsibility of military personnel
III. Traditional contributors to international military operations
6. Canada : committed contributor of ideas and forces, but with growing doubts and problems
7. Norway : political consensus and the problem of accountability
8. India : democratic, poor, internationalist
IV. Newcomers to international military operations
9. Japan : moderate commitment within legal strictures
10. Germany : ensuring political legitimacy for the use of military forces by requiring constitutional accountability
V. Permanent members of the UN Security Council
11. Russian Federation : the pendulum of powers and accountability
12. France : Security Council legitimacy and executive primacy
13. The United Kingdom : increasing commitment requires greater parliamentary involvement
14. The United States : democracy, hegemony, and accountability
VI. Conclusion
15. Toward a mixed system of democratic accountability
서평쓰기