국방대학교 도서관검색
- Home
- 기능목록
- 검색
-
Marc 보기
MARC 닫기
-
LDR
00000cam c2200205 c 4500
-
001
000005144480
-
005
20240930211456
-
007
ta
-
008
240930s2024 nyua b 001c0 eng
-
020
▼a 9780231209908
▼q (hardback) -
040
▼a 211070
▼c 211070
▼d 211070 -
050
▼a HB801
-
090
▼a HB801
▼b K92 -
245
▼a Arguing about tastes :
▼b modeling how context and experience change economic preferences /
▼d David M. Kreps ,
▼e Alessandra Casella ,
▼e Joseph E. Stiglitz -
260
▼a New York :
▼b Columbia University Press,
▼c [2024] -
300
▼a xii, 202 pages :
▼b illustrations ;
▼c 23 cm -
490
▼a Kenneth J. Arrow lecture series
-
504
▼a Includes bibliographical references and index
-
520
▼a "Gary Becker once wrote a periodic column for Business Week, and, in the December 29, 1997 issue, his column was entitled "Why Every Married Couple Should Sign a Contract." Becker argues, roughly, that marriage, a complex contractual arrangement (subject to dissolution), should be fine-tuned to the circumstances and desires of the two parties, assuming their beliefs and preference are static. In lieu of defaulting to one-size-fits-all divorce law, Becker argues, it is better to take matters in to your own hands and craft a detailed agreement best suited to you and your partner. And, to deal with the objection that one party might take the mention by the other of such an arrangement as a signal of . . . something less than romantic love, Becker says that making such an arrangement mandatory will defeat this signaling problem. But is this premise-that negotiating a prenup will have no impact on preferences-reasonable? David Kreps instead seeks to challenge this assumption, and indeed in a broader sense, the principle of orthodox economics that de gustibus non disputandem est, there is no arguing about tastes. Building on Arrow formal models of choice, preference, and utility maximization, Kreps argues that accounting for dynamic personal tastes should be a mainstream element of economics, focusing on the interaction between intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives, both in static situations and in more dynamic contexts. He ends with a discussion of whether or not accounting for individual preferences is good for the soul of economics"--
▼c Provided by publisher. -
650
▼a Demand (Economic theory)
-
650
▼a Utility theory
-
650
▼a Uncertainty
-
650
▼a Game theory
-
650
▼a Microeconomics
-
650
▼a Consumers' preferences
-
700
▼a Casella, Alessandra,
▼e author -
700
▼a Stiglitz, Joseph E.,
▼e author -
950
▼b $80
-
991
▼a 단행본
-
LDR
- 바구니담기
- 내서재 담기
- 내보내기
상세정보
Arguing about tastes : modeling how context and experience change economic preferences
QR코드| 자료유형 : | 단행본 |
|---|---|
| ISBN : | 9780231209908 |
| 분류기호 : | HB801 |
| 서명/저자사항 : | Arguing about tastes : modeling how context and experience change economic preferences / David M. Kreps , Alessandra Casella , Joseph E. Stiglitz |
| 발행사항 : | New York : Columbia University Press, [2024] |
| 형태사항 : | xii, 202 pages : illustrations ; 23 cm |
| 총서사항 : | Kenneth J. Arrow lecture series |
| 서지주기 : | Includes bibliographical references and index |
| 요약 : | "Gary Becker once wrote a periodic column for Business Week, and, in the December 29, 1997 issue, his column was entitled "Why Every Married Couple Should Sign a Contract." Becker argues, roughly, that marriage, a complex contractual arrangement (subject to dissolution), should be fine-tuned to the circumstances and desires of the two parties, assuming their beliefs and preference are static. In lieu of defaulting to one-size-fits-all divorce law, Becker argues, it is better to take matters in to your own hands and craft a detailed agreement best suited to you and your partner. And, to deal with the objection that one party might take the mention by the other of such an arrangement as a signal of . . . something less than romantic love, Becker says that making such an arrangement mandatory will defeat this signaling problem. But is this premise-that negotiating a prenup will have no impact on preferences-reasonable? David Kreps instead seeks to challenge this assumption, and indeed in a broader sense, the principle of orthodox economics that de gustibus non disputandem est, there is no arguing about tastes. Building on Arrow formal models of choice, preference, and utility maximization, Kreps argues that accounting for dynamic personal tastes should be a mainstream element of economics, focusing on the interaction between intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives, both in static situations and in more dynamic contexts. He ends with a discussion of whether or not accounting for individual preferences is good for the soul of economics"-- Provided by publisher. |
| 일반주제명 : | Demand (Economic theory) -- |
| 일반주제명 : | Utility theory -- |
| 일반주제명 : | Uncertainty -- |
| 일반주제명 : | Game theory -- |
| 일반주제명 : | Microeconomics -- |
| 일반주제명 : | Consumers' preferences -- |
| 개인저자 : | Casella, Alessandra, author |
| 개인저자 : | Stiglitz, Joseph E., author |
| 언어 | 영어 |
예약
- 1. 예약현황은 홈페이지 로그인 후 예약 페이지에 확인 가능합니다.
- 2. 도착 통보된 예약자료 대출을 원하지 않는 경우에는 예약 현황에서 취소할 수 있습니다.
- 3. 기타 문의사항은 도서관에 문의 바랍니다.
무인예약대출
- 1. 무인예약대출 현황은 홈페이지 로그인 후 무인예약대출 페이지에 확인 가능합니다.
- 2. 무인예약대출자료 대출을 원하지 않는 경우에는 무인예약대출 페이지에서 신청 또는 접수상태인 경우만 취소할 수 있습니다.
- 3. 희망대출일은 신청일로부터 최대 1주일 까지 가능합니다.
- 4. 희망대출일을 선택하지 않은 경우 대출대기 통보 후 1주일까지 기기에서 대출가능합니다.
- 5. 기타 문의사항은 도서관에 문의 바랍니다.
서평쓰기