MARC 닫기
00000cam c2200205 c 4500
000005144406
20241013164640
ta
240930s2024 enk b 001c0 eng
▼a 9781032321219
▼q (hardback)
▼a 9781032321202
▼q (paperback)
▼z 9781003312925
▼q (ebook)
▼a 211070
▼c 211070
▼d 211070
▼a U22
▼a U22
▼b B167
▼a Ethics at war :
▼b how should military personnel make ethical decisions? /
▼d Deane-Peter Baker,
▼e Rufus Black,
▼e Roger Herbert,
▼e Iain King
▼a How should military personnel make ethical decisions?
▼a London ;
▼a New York, NY :
▼b Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group,
▼c 2024
▼a xvi, 158 pages ;
▼c 24 cm
▼a War, conflict and ethics
▼a Includes bibliographical references and index.
▼a Theory -- The ethical triangulation model / Dean-Peter Baker -- The moral deliberation roadmap : the US Naval Academy's moral reasoning framework / Roger Herbert -- The quasi-utilitarian approach to decision-making in war / Iain King -- A natural law basis for military ethics / Rufus Black -- Analysis and critique -- Baker response / Dean-Peter Baker -- Herbert response / Roger Herbert -- King response / Iain King -- Black response / Rufus Black -- A concluding reflection on military ethical decision-making / David Whetham.
▼a "This book debates competing approaches to ethical decision-making for members of the armed forces of liberal-democratic states. In this volume, four prominent thinkers propose and debate competing approaches to ethical decision-making for military personnel. Deane-Peter Baker presents and expounds the 'Ethical Triangulation' model, an ethical decision-making method he has employed through much of his career as an applied military ethicist. Rufus Black advocates for a natural law-based approach, one which has heavily influenced the framework formally adopted by the Australian Defence Force. Roger Herbert outlines the 'Moral Deliberation Roadmap', the moral reasoning framework recently adopted by the US Naval Academy. Iain King then sets out a model of quasi-utilitarian decision-making developed in several post-conflict settings and refined at the UK's Royal College of Defence Studies. After the opening chapters in which each author outlines their favoured decision-making approach, the four contributors then evaluate each other's proposals, often critically. Philosopher David Whetham offers some concluding thoughts in which he summarises areas of agreement between the authors, identifies key areas of difference, and suggests directions for future research. This book will be of great interest to students of military ethics, the ethics of war, moral philosophy, and International Relations, as well as military professionals"--
▼c Provided by publisher.
▼a Military ethics
▼z Western countries.
▼a Command of troops.
▼a Decision making
▼x Moral and ethical aspects.
▼a War
▼x Decision-making.
▼a War
▼x Moral and ethical aspects.
▼a Black, Rufus,
▼e author.
▼a Herbert, Roger G.,
▼c Jr.,
▼e author.
▼a King, Iain,
▼d 1971-,
▼e author.
▼a War, conflict and ethics
▼b £36.99
▼a 단행본
| 자료유형 : | 단행본 |
|---|---|
| ISBN : | 9781032321219 |
| ISBN : | 9781032321202 |
| ISBN : | |
| 분류기호 : | U22 |
| 서명/저자사항 : | Ethics at war : how should military personnel make ethical decisions? / Deane-Peter Baker, Rufus Black, Roger Herbert, Iain King |
| 발행사항 : | London ; New York, NY : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2024 |
| 형태사항 : | xvi, 158 pages ; 24 cm |
| 총서사항 : | War, conflict and ethics |
| 서지주기 : | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
| 내용주기 : | Theory -- The ethical triangulation model / Dean-Peter Baker -- The moral deliberation roadmap : the US Naval Academy's moral reasoning framework / Roger Herbert -- The quasi-utilitarian approach to decision-making in war / Iain King -- A natural law basis for military ethics / Rufus Black -- Analysis and critique -- Baker response / Dean-Peter Baker -- Herbert response / Roger Herbert -- King response / Iain King -- Black response / Rufus Black -- A concluding reflection on military ethical decision-making / David Whetham. |
| 요약 : | "This book debates competing approaches to ethical decision-making for members of the armed forces of liberal-democratic states. In this volume, four prominent thinkers propose and debate competing approaches to ethical decision-making for military personnel. Deane-Peter Baker presents and expounds the 'Ethical Triangulation' model, an ethical decision-making method he has employed through much of his career as an applied military ethicist. Rufus Black advocates for a natural law-based approach, one which has heavily influenced the framework formally adopted by the Australian Defence Force. Roger Herbert outlines the 'Moral Deliberation Roadmap', the moral reasoning framework recently adopted by the US Naval Academy. Iain King then sets out a model of quasi-utilitarian decision-making developed in several post-conflict settings and refined at the UK's Royal College of Defence Studies. After the opening chapters in which each author outlines their favoured decision-making approach, the four contributors then evaluate each other's proposals, often critically. Philosopher David Whetham offers some concluding thoughts in which he summarises areas of agreement between the authors, identifies key areas of difference, and suggests directions for future research. This book will be of great interest to students of military ethics, the ethics of war, moral philosophy, and International Relations, as well as military professionals"-- Provided by publisher. |
| 일반주제명 : | Military ethics -- Western countries. -- |
| 일반주제명 : | Command of troops. -- |
| 일반주제명 : | Decision making -- Moral and ethical aspects. -- |
| 일반주제명 : | War -- Decision-making. -- |
| 일반주제명 : | War -- Moral and ethical aspects. -- |
| 개인저자 : | Black, Rufus, author. |
| 개인저자 : | Herbert, Roger G., Jr., author. |
| 개인저자 : | King, Iain, 1971-, author. |
| 언어 | 영어 |
서평쓰기