Advanced Search
- Home
- Search
- Advanced Search
-
MARC
MARC Close
-
LDR
00000cam c2200205 c 4500
-
001
000000587931
-
005
20201228150040
-
006
m d
-
007
cr |n|||||||||
-
008
190902s2019 nyu ob 001 engd
-
019
▼a 1111971703
▼a 1119640692 -
020
▼a 1462540503
▼q electronic book -
020
▼a 9781462540501
▼q (electronic bk.) -
020
▼z 1462540473
-
020
▼z 9781462540471
-
035
▼a 2100960
▼b (N$T) -
035
▼a (OCoLC)1117298420
▼z (OCoLC)1111971703
▼z (OCoLC)1119640692 -
040
▼a YDX
▼b eng
▼c YDX
▼d YDXIT
▼d 248023
▼d EBLCP
▼d N$T
▼e rda
▼e pn -
043
▼a n-us---
-
049
▼a MAIN
-
050
▼a KF480.A7
▼b M49 2019 -
082
▼a 344.7304/4
▼2 23 -
100
▼a Weaver, Christopher M.,
▼e author. -
245
▼a Law and mental health
▼h [electronic resource]:
▼b a case-based approach/
▼d Christopher M. Weaver, Robert G. Meyer. -
250
▼a Second edition.
-
260
▼a New York:
▼b The Guilford Press,
▼c [2019]. -
300
▼a 1 online resource.
-
336
▼a text
▼b txt
▼2 rdacontent -
337
▼a computer
▼b c
▼2 rdamedia -
338
▼a online resource
▼b cr
▼2 rdacarrier -
504
▼a Includes bibliographical references and index.
-
505
▼a Cover; Half Title Page; Title Page; Copyright; Dedication; About the Authors; Author's Note: Opportunities Gained; Acknowledgments; Contents; Introduction; Part I. Psychological Issues and Involvement in Basic Courtroom Proceedings; 1. Jury Selection and Process: Precedent Impacting Jury Consultation and Research; The Case of the Mitchell-Stans Conspiracy Trial: The Importance of Consistent Jury Selection Procedures; The Case of Batson v. Kentucky (1986): Juror Race in Jury Selection; The Case of Snyder v. Louisiana (2008): Refining Requirements for Race-Neutral Explanations
-
505
▼a 2. Admission of Expert Testimony and the EyewitnessThe Case of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993): The Evolution of Qualifications for the Admissibility of Expert Testimony; The Case of Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael (1999): Clarifying the Applicability of Daubert; The Case of Perry v. New Hampshire (2012): Eyewitness Testimony Goes to the U.S. Supreme Court; Part II. Legal Precedent in Everyday Clinical Practice; 3. Informed Consent; The Case of Miranda v. Arizona (1966): The Importance of Disclosure; The Case of Zinermon v. Burch (1990): The Importance of Capacity
-
505
▼a 4. Confidentiality and Privileged CommunicationThe Case of In re Lifschutz (1970): Therapist-Patient Privilege and Privilege Waiver; The Case of Jaffee v. Redmond (1996): Broadening Therapist-Client Privilege; 5. Duty to Warn and Protect; The Case of Tarasoff v. the Regents of the University of California (1976): Dangerousness to Others and the Duty to Warn and Protect; The Case of Almonte v. New York Medical College (1994): Duty to Warn and Protect a Nonspecified Victim; The Case of Garner v. Stone (1973): Confidentiality and the Duty Not to Warn and Protect
-
505
▼a Part III. Clinical Forensic Evaluation6. Competency; The Case of Dusky v. United States (1959): Defining Due Process Standards in Competency to Stand Trial Cases; The Case of Godinez v. Moran (1993): The Constitutional Basis for Separate Competencies; The Case of Indiana v. Edwards (2008): The Contemporary Importance of Competency Guidelines; 7. Insanity and Criminal Responsibility; The Case of In re M'Naghten (1843): The First Formal Test of Criminal Responsibility; The Case of John Hinckley: Public Outcry Spurring Insanity Defense Reform
-
505
▼a The Case of Clark v. Arizona (2006): State Discretion in Adopting Custom Standards and Limiting Expert Testimony on Mental Illness8. Civil Commitment and Dangerousness; The Case of O'Connor v. Donaldson (1975): The Criteria for Involuntary Commitment; The Case of Foucha v. Louisiana (1992): Dangerousness and Mental Illness as Criteria for Indefinite Commitment; 9. Hypnosis and the Polygraph; The Case of the Hillside Strangler: The Veracity of Hypnosis in a Forensic Setting; The Case of Rock v. Arkansas (1987): U.S. Supreme Court Acknowledgment of Hurd Criteria
-
520
▼a "Favored by instructors and students for its real-world focus and engaging style, this authoritative text on the interface of psychology and law has now been revised and expanded. Each chapter provides an overview of case law on an important topic and explores selected cases in depth. Coverage includes psychological and mental health issues in criminal and civil proceedings; the role of practitioners as expert witnesses and forensic consultants; and legal concerns in general clinical practice. Salient legal processes and decisions are summarized and implications for today's clinical and forensic practitioners highlighted. Instructors who request a desk copy receive a supplemental Test Bank with questions keyed to each chapter. Students can access a downloadable Study Guide. New to This Edition *Updated throughout with current research and substantive changes in mental health law. *Chapter on competency in juvenile justice. *Citations of 115 new legal cases. *Conclusion identifying urgent social challenges facing the field. Subject areas/key words: forensic psychology , mental health law, psychology and law, law and behavioral science, legal cases, expert testimony, expert witnesses, case law, legal precedents, forensic mental health, forensic psychological assessments, forensic assessments, forensic psychological evaluations, psychiatric examination, juvenile justice, psychopathy, liability, malpractice, textbooks, casebooks, texts Audience: Students and practitioners in clinical and forensic psychology, psychiatry, and social work; also of interest in criminal justice and criminology"--
▼c Provided by publisher. -
588
▼a Description based on online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on September 06, 2019).
-
650
▼a Mental health laws
▼z United States
▼v Cases. -
650
▼a Insanity (Law)
▼z United States
▼v Cases. -
650
▼a Forensic psychiatry
▼z United States
▼v Cases. -
700
▼a Meyer, Robert G.,
▼e author. -
776
▼i Print version:,
▼z 1462540473,
▼z 9781462540471
▼w (OCoLC)1078885953 -
856
▼3 EBSCOhost
▼u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=2100960 -
990
▼a 강리원
▼b 강리원 -
991
▼a eBook
-
LDR
- Put to Basket
- Add to my library
- Export
Detailed Information
Law and mental health : a case-based approach [electronic resource] / Second edition
QR Code| Data Type : | eBook |
|---|---|
| ISBN : | 1462540503 |
| ISBN : | 9781462540501 |
| ISBN : | |
| ISBN : | |
| Personal Author : | Weaver, Christopher M., author. |
| Title/Author : | Law and mental health [electronic resource]: a case-based approach/ Christopher M. Weaver, Robert G. Meyer. |
| Edition : | Second edition. |
| Imprint : | New York: The Guilford Press, [2019]. |
| Format : | 1 online resource. |
| Note : | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
| Content Note : | Cover; Half Title Page; Title Page; Copyright; Dedication; About the Authors; Author's Note: Opportunities Gained; Acknowledgments; Contents; Introduction; Part I. Psychological Issues and Involvement in Basic Courtroom Proceedings; 1. Jury Selection and Process: Precedent Impacting Jury Consultation and Research; The Case of the Mitchell-Stans Conspiracy Trial: The Importance of Consistent Jury Selection Procedures; The Case of Batson v. Kentucky (1986): Juror Race in Jury Selection; The Case of Snyder v. Louisiana (2008): Refining Requirements for Race-Neutral Explanations |
| Content Note : | 2. Admission of Expert Testimony and the EyewitnessThe Case of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993): The Evolution of Qualifications for the Admissibility of Expert Testimony; The Case of Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael (1999): Clarifying the Applicability of Daubert; The Case of Perry v. New Hampshire (2012): Eyewitness Testimony Goes to the U.S. Supreme Court; Part II. Legal Precedent in Everyday Clinical Practice; 3. Informed Consent; The Case of Miranda v. Arizona (1966): The Importance of Disclosure; The Case of Zinermon v. Burch (1990): The Importance of Capacity |
| Content Note : | 4. Confidentiality and Privileged CommunicationThe Case of In re Lifschutz (1970): Therapist-Patient Privilege and Privilege Waiver; The Case of Jaffee v. Redmond (1996): Broadening Therapist-Client Privilege; 5. Duty to Warn and Protect; The Case of Tarasoff v. the Regents of the University of California (1976): Dangerousness to Others and the Duty to Warn and Protect; The Case of Almonte v. New York Medical College (1994): Duty to Warn and Protect a Nonspecified Victim; The Case of Garner v. Stone (1973): Confidentiality and the Duty Not to Warn and Protect |
| Content Note : | Part III. Clinical Forensic Evaluation6. Competency; The Case of Dusky v. United States (1959): Defining Due Process Standards in Competency to Stand Trial Cases; The Case of Godinez v. Moran (1993): The Constitutional Basis for Separate Competencies; The Case of Indiana v. Edwards (2008): The Contemporary Importance of Competency Guidelines; 7. Insanity and Criminal Responsibility; The Case of In re M'Naghten (1843): The First Formal Test of Criminal Responsibility; The Case of John Hinckley: Public Outcry Spurring Insanity Defense Reform |
| Content Note : | The Case of Clark v. Arizona (2006): State Discretion in Adopting Custom Standards and Limiting Expert Testimony on Mental Illness8. Civil Commitment and Dangerousness; The Case of O'Connor v. Donaldson (1975): The Criteria for Involuntary Commitment; The Case of Foucha v. Louisiana (1992): Dangerousness and Mental Illness as Criteria for Indefinite Commitment; 9. Hypnosis and the Polygraph; The Case of the Hillside Strangler: The Veracity of Hypnosis in a Forensic Setting; The Case of Rock v. Arkansas (1987): U.S. Supreme Court Acknowledgment of Hurd Criteria |
| 요약 : | "Favored by instructors and students for its real-world focus and engaging style, this authoritative text on the interface of psychology and law has now been revised and expanded. Each chapter provides an overview of case law on an important topic and explores selected cases in depth. Coverage includes psychological and mental health issues in criminal and civil proceedings; the role of practitioners as expert witnesses and forensic consultants; and legal concerns in general clinical practice. Salient legal processes and decisions are summarized and implications for today's clinical and forensic practitioners highlighted. Instructors who request a desk copy receive a supplemental Test Bank with questions keyed to each chapter. Students can access a downloadable Study Guide. New to This Edition *Updated throughout with current research and substantive changes in mental health law. *Chapter on competency in juvenile justice. *Citations of 115 new legal cases. *Conclusion identifying urgent social challenges facing the field. Subject areas/key words: forensic psychology , mental health law, psychology and law, law and behavioral science, legal cases, expert testimony, expert witnesses, case law, legal precedents, forensic mental health, forensic psychological assessments, forensic assessments, forensic psychological evaluations, psychiatric examination, juvenile justice, psychopathy, liability, malpractice, textbooks, casebooks, texts Audience: Students and practitioners in clinical and forensic psychology, psychiatry, and social work; also of interest in criminal justice and criminology"-- Provided by publisher. |
| General Subject Name : | Mental health laws -- United States -- Cases. -- |
| General Subject Name : | Insanity (Law) -- United States -- Cases. -- |
| General Subject Name : | Forensic psychiatry -- United States -- Cases. -- |
| Personal Author : | Meyer, Robert G., author. |
| 기타형태 저록 : | Print version:, 1462540473, 9781462540471 |
| Language | English |
| URL : |
|---|
예약
- 1. 예약현황은 홈페이지 로그인 후 예약 페이지에 확인 가능합니다.
- 2. 도착 통보된 예약자료 대출을 원하지 않는 경우에는 예약 현황에서 취소할 수 있습니다.
- 3. 기타 문의사항은 도서관에 문의 바랍니다.
무인예약대출
- 1. 무인예약대출 현황은 홈페이지 로그인 후 무인예약대출 페이지에 확인 가능합니다.
- 2. 무인예약대출자료 대출을 원하지 않는 경우에는 무인예약대출 페이지에서 신청 또는 접수상태인 경우만 취소할 수 있습니다.
- 3. 희망대출일은 신청일로부터 최대 1주일 까지 가능합니다.
- 4. 희망대출일을 선택하지 않은 경우 대출대기 통보 후 1주일까지 기기에서 대출가능합니다.
- 5. 기타 문의사항은 도서관에 문의 바랍니다.
Write Review