MARC 닫기
00000nam c2200205 c 4500
000000857419
20170724110622
170714s2016 us 000a eng
▼a 151909812X
▼a 9781519098122:
▼c \21000
▼a 243002
▼c 243002
▼d 243002
▼a U.S. Government.
▼a Russia and hybrid warfare: identifying critical elements in successful applications of hybrid tactics/
▼d by U.S. Government ,
▼e U.S. Military ,
▼e Department of Defense (DoD).
▼a United States:
▼b Independently published,
▼c 2016.
▼a [101 p. ];
▼c 23 cm.
▼a Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited
▼a With the Russian annexation of Crimea in 2014, hybrid war became a buzzword within political and academic circles. This study examines hybrid warfare applications using contemporary and historical examples. The analysis seeks to determine why a country was or was not successful in its execution of hybrid war, and it assesses the geopolitical context of cost, benefit, and risk for an aggressor state contributing to its decision to engage in hybrid warfare. The case studies selected include the 1923 German Communist Revolution, Germany's 1938 annexation of Austria, the 2008 Russia-Georgia War, and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. In each case study, a state went on the offensive, deliberately choosing hybrid tactics to obtain an objective. Ultimately, the study objective strives to deepen our understanding of hybrid war, and to extrapolate how one seemingly minor hybrid event can be tied into a broader goal of an aggressor state in its interactions with a defender state. The analysis of the case studies suggests that the length of the conflict, local support, consolidated leadership, and the power balance between the two states involved have contributed to the success of state-sponsored hybrid war.
▼a Captain, United States Air Force
▼a This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States
▼a Russia
▼a Nazi Germany
▼a Austria
▼a Soviet Union
▼a Georgia
▼a Ukraine
▼a hybrid war
▼a non-linear war
▼a hybrid tactics
▼a state-sponsored hybrid war
▼a annexation
▼a Thesis
▼a U.S. Military.
▼a Department of Defense.
▼a Shore, Zachary
▼4 ctb
▼a Tsypkin, Mikhail
▼4 ctb
▼a National Security Affairs
▼4 ctb
▼a National Security Affairs
▼4 ctb
▼a Neville, Seth B.
▼4 cre
▼a 송미영
▼b 송미영
▼a 355.40947
▼b U58r
| 자료유형 : | 단행본 |
|---|---|
| ISBN : | 151909812X |
| ISBN : | 9781519098122: |
| 단체저자명 : | U.S. Government. |
| 서명/저자사항 : | Russia and hybrid warfare: identifying critical elements in successful applications of hybrid tactics/ by U.S. Government , U.S. Military , Department of Defense (DoD). |
| 발행사항 : | United States: Independently published, 2016. |
| 형태사항 : | [101 p. ]; 23 cm. |
| 요약 등 : | Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited |
| 요약 등 : | With the Russian annexation of Crimea in 2014, hybrid war became a buzzword within political and academic circles. This study examines hybrid warfare applications using contemporary and historical examples. The analysis seeks to determine why a country was or was not successful in its execution of hybrid war, and it assesses the geopolitical context of cost, benefit, and risk for an aggressor state contributing to its decision to engage in hybrid warfare. The case studies selected include the 1923 German Communist Revolution, Germany's 1938 annexation of Austria, the 2008 Russia-Georgia War, and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. In each case study, a state went on the offensive, deliberately choosing hybrid tactics to obtain an objective. Ultimately, the study objective strives to deepen our understanding of hybrid war, and to extrapolate how one seemingly minor hybrid event can be tied into a broader goal of an aggressor state in its interactions with a defender state. The analysis of the case studies suggests that the length of the conflict, local support, consolidated leadership, and the power balance between the two states involved have contributed to the success of state-sponsored hybrid war. |
| 요약 등 : | Captain, United States Air Force |
| 제한주기 : | This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States |
| 단체저자명 : | U.S. Military. |
| 단체저자명 : | Department of Defense. |
| 분류기호 : | 355.40947 |
| 언어 | 영어 |
서평쓰기