공군사관학교 학술정보원
검색
- Home
- 기능목록
- 검색
-
Marc 보기
MARC 닫기
-
LDR
00000cam c2200205 i 4500
-
001
000001292151
-
005
20190903182819
-
008
190829s2017 mdua b 001 0 eng
-
010
▼a 2017038150
-
020
▼a 9781682472507 (hard cover : alk. paper)
-
040
▼a DLC
▼b eng
▼c DLC
▼d DLC
▼e rda
▼d 243002 -
042
▼a pcc
-
043
▼a n-us---
-
090
▼a 355.42
▼b M513l -
100
▼a Meilinger, Phillip S.,
▼d 1948-,
▼e author. -
245
▼a Limiting risk in America's wars:
▼b airpower, asymmetrics, and a new strategic paradigm/
▼d Phillip S. Meilinger. -
246
▼a Airpower, asymmetrics, and a new strategic paradigm
-
260
▼a Annapolis, Maryland:
▼b Naval Institute Press,
▼c [2017]. -
300
▼a xix, 277 p.:
▼b illustrations;
▼c 24 cm. -
490
▼a Transforming war
-
504
▼a Includes bibliographical references (pages 207-265) and index.
-
505
▼a Liddell Hart and limiting risk -- Winners: Britain, Wellington, the Arab Revolt, and Operation Torch -- Losers and a tie: the Sicilian Expedition, the Imjin War, Bonaparte, Gallipoli, and the Norwegian Campaign -- The rationale for a second front and indirectness -- Reasons for success or failure -- Limited wars with limited aims and means -- Descent into disaster -- An idea whose time has gone -- A new paradigm for success.
-
520
▼a "The United States has the most expensive and seemingly unstoppable military in the world. Yet, since World War II the nation's military success rate has been meager. The Korean War was a draw, while Vietnam, Mogadishu, Afghanistan, and Iraq were clear losses. Successes include Iraq in 1991, the Balkans (Croatia and Kosovo), Panama, the initial takedowns of Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003, and Libya. What differentiates the failures from the successes? Failures have been marked by the introduction of large numbers of conventional American ground troops, while successes have been characterized by the use of airpower, special operations forces, robust intelligence and sensor platforms, and the use of indigenous ground troops. Phillip S. Meilinger's new book advocates strategies that limit risks in war as well as achieve measurable goals. Instead of large numbers of conventional ground troops, the author argues in favor of a focus on asymmetric capabilities--a combination of airpower, special operation forces, intelligence, and indigenous ground troops--to achieve the desired political outcomes."--Provided by publisher.
-
650
▼a Asymmetric warfare
▼v Case studies. -
650
▼a Air power
▼z United States. -
650
▼a Asymmetric warfare
▼z United States. -
650
▼a Risk management
▼z United States
▼v Case studies. -
651
▼a United States
▼v Case studies.
▼x Military policy -
776
▼i Online version:
▼a Meilinger, Phillip S., 1948- author.
▼t Limiting risk in war.
▼d Annapolis, Maryland : Naval Institute Press, [2017],
▼z 9781682472514
▼w (DLC) 2017059010 -
990
▼a 이미소
-
991
▼a 단행본
-
LDR
- 바구니담기
- 내서재 담기
- 내보내기
상세정보
Limiting risk in America's wars : airpower, asymmetrics, and a new strategic paradigm
QR코드| 자료유형 : | 단행본 |
|---|---|
| ISBN : | 9781682472507 (hard cover : alk. paper) |
| 분류기호 : | 355.42 |
| 개인저자 : | Meilinger, Phillip S., 1948-, author. |
| 서명/저자사항 : | Limiting risk in America's wars: airpower, asymmetrics, and a new strategic paradigm/ Phillip S. Meilinger. |
| 발행사항 : | Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press, [2017]. |
| 형태사항 : | xix, 277 p.: illustrations; 24 cm. |
| 총서사항 : | Transforming war |
| 서지주기 : | Includes bibliographical references (pages 207-265) and index. |
| 내용주기 : | Liddell Hart and limiting risk -- Winners: Britain, Wellington, the Arab Revolt, and Operation Torch -- Losers and a tie: the Sicilian Expedition, the Imjin War, Bonaparte, Gallipoli, and the Norwegian Campaign -- The rationale for a second front and indirectness -- Reasons for success or failure -- Limited wars with limited aims and means -- Descent into disaster -- An idea whose time has gone -- A new paradigm for success. |
| 요약 : | "The United States has the most expensive and seemingly unstoppable military in the world. Yet, since World War II the nation's military success rate has been meager. The Korean War was a draw, while Vietnam, Mogadishu, Afghanistan, and Iraq were clear losses. Successes include Iraq in 1991, the Balkans (Croatia and Kosovo), Panama, the initial takedowns of Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003, and Libya. What differentiates the failures from the successes? Failures have been marked by the introduction of large numbers of conventional American ground troops, while successes have been characterized by the use of airpower, special operations forces, robust intelligence and sensor platforms, and the use of indigenous ground troops. Phillip S. Meilinger's new book advocates strategies that limit risks in war as well as achieve measurable goals. Instead of large numbers of conventional ground troops, the author argues in favor of a focus on asymmetric capabilities--a combination of airpower, special operation forces, intelligence, and indigenous ground troops--to achieve the desired political outcomes."--Provided by publisher. |
| 일반주제명 : | Asymmetric warfare -- Case studies. -- |
| 일반주제명 : | Air power -- United States. -- |
| 일반주제명 : | Asymmetric warfare -- United States. -- |
| 일반주제명 : | Risk management -- United States -- Case studies. -- |
| 주제명(지명) : | United States Case studies. Military policy |
| 기타형태 저록 : | Online version: Meilinger, Phillip S., 1948- author. Limiting risk in war. Annapolis, Maryland : Naval Institute Press, [2017], 9781682472514 |
| 언어 | 영어 |
예약
- 1. 예약현황은 홈페이지 로그인 후 예약 페이지에 확인 가능합니다.
- 2. 도착 통보된 예약자료 대출을 원하지 않는 경우에는 예약 현황에서 취소할 수 있습니다.
- 3. 기타 문의사항은 도서관에 문의 바랍니다.
무인예약대출
- 1. 무인예약대출 현황은 홈페이지 로그인 후 무인예약대출 페이지에 확인 가능합니다.
- 2. 무인예약대출자료 대출을 원하지 않는 경우에는 무인예약대출 페이지에서 신청 또는 접수상태인 경우만 취소할 수 있습니다.
- 3. 희망대출일은 신청일로부터 최대 1주일 까지 가능합니다.
- 4. 희망대출일을 선택하지 않은 경우 대출대기 통보 후 1주일까지 기기에서 대출가능합니다.
- 5. 기타 문의사항은 도서관에 문의 바랍니다.
서평쓰기